The EU Pay Transparency Directive (Directive (EU) 2023/970) requires employers to give candidates pay information before the interview, let workers request pay data broken down by sex, make pay-setting criteria accessible and, from 100 workers, report on their gender pay gap. Member states had to transpose it by 7 June 2026, so its obligations now reach employers through national laws as each country adopts them, and the first reports are due by 7 June 2027, based on 2026 pay data.
To prepare, HR teams need five building blocks: a clear job architecture, a gender-neutral job evaluation, pay ranges built on objective criteria, a gender pay gap analysis and processes to answer candidates, employees and regulators. This guide explains what the Directive requires, article by article, who is covered, the deadlines, and gives you a step-by-step plan and a checklist you can work through.
TalentUp’s job postings data shows how much work is left: only about one in four job ads or fewer in Germany, France, Spain and Italy states a salary, while mentions of pay transparency rules in EU job ads have grown more than tenfold since 2024.
Key takeaways
- The Directive covers all employers in the public and private sectors; gender pay gap reporting starts at 100 workers.
- Candidates must get the initial pay or pay range before the interview, and employers may no longer ask about pay history.
- Workers can request their pay level and average pay by sex for work of equal value, with an answer due within two months.
- An unexplained gap of 5% or more in any category of workers, not fixed within six months, triggers a joint pay assessment.
- If you do not meet the transparency obligations, the burden of proof in pay discrimination cases falls on you.
- Start with job architecture and gender-neutral job evaluation: every other obligation depends on comparing “work of equal value”.
What Is the EU Pay Transparency Directive and Who Does It Cover?
The Directive sets minimum requirements to enforce the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between women and men, which is enshrined in Article 157 of the EU Treaty but has been hard to enforce because pay information was hidden. It does this in two ways: transparency (candidates and workers get information) and enforcement (workers get stronger remedies and employers carry more of the burden of proof).
Three definitions shape everything HR has to do:
- Pay is not just base salary. It is the basic wage or salary plus any other consideration, in cash or in kind, including complementary or variable components such as bonuses, overtime, allowances or benefits in kind.
- Work of equal value is determined using objective, gender-neutral criteria that must include skills, effort, responsibility and working conditions (Article 4).
- Category of workers means workers doing the same work or work of equal value, grouped in a non-arbitrary way using those criteria. Pay gaps are assessed per category, not just for the company as a whole.
Which Obligations Apply to Your Organization
The Directive applies to employers in the public and private sectors and to all workers with an employment contract or relationship; the pre-employment rules also protect job applicants. What changes with size is reporting:
| Obligation |
Under 50 workers |
50–99 |
100–149 |
150–249 |
250+ |
| Pay information for candidates, pay history ban (Art. 5) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Accessible pay-setting criteria (Art. 6) |
Yes (pay progression may be exempted) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Right to information, annual notice (Art. 7) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| No pay secrecy clauses (Art. 7(5)) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
| Gender pay gap reporting (Art. 9) |
Voluntary* |
Voluntary* |
Every 3 years from 2031 |
Every 3 years from 2027 |
Every year from 2027 |
| Joint pay assessment if triggered (Art. 10) |
No |
No |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
*Member states may require smaller employers to report on pay under national law. Member states must also provide technical assistance and training to employers with fewer than 250 workers (Article 11).
Because the Directive sets minimum standards, national laws can go further, for example with lower thresholds or earlier deadlines. For the country picture, see our guide to the 2026 EU pay transparency law and its transposition and our overview of salary transparency in Europe by country.
What the Directive Requires, Article by Article
The table summarizes the obligations that matter most for HR. The sub-sections below explain what each one means in practice.
| Article |
Requirement |
What HR must have in place |
| Art. 4 |
Pay structures that ensure equal pay for equal work or work of equal value |
Gender-neutral job evaluation using skills, effort, responsibility and working conditions |
| Art. 5 |
Initial pay or range given to candidates before the interview; no pay history questions; gender-neutral job titles and ads |
Pay range for every vacancy, updated recruiting scripts and templates |
| Art. 6 |
Pay, pay level and pay progression criteria easily accessible to workers |
Written, objective pay policy and progression rules |
| Art. 7 |
Workers can request their pay level and average pay by sex for their category; answer within two months; annual notice of this right |
Request workflow, data extraction, templates, annual communication |
| Art. 9 |
Gender pay gap reporting (seven indicators) from 100 workers |
Payroll data model by sex, category, base and variable pay |
| Art. 10 |
Joint pay assessment if an unjustified gap of 5%+ is not remedied within six months |
Gap analysis, justification file, remediation budget |
| Art. 16–18 |
Full compensation without upper limit; burden of proof on the employer |
Documentation of every pay decision |
| Art. 21, 23 |
Limitation periods of at least three years; fines and specific penalties for repeat infringements |
Record retention and governance |
Pay Transparency Before Hiring (Article 5)
Applicants have the right to receive the initial pay or its range, based on objective, gender-neutral criteria, plus the relevant provisions of any collective agreement applied to the role. The information must allow an informed negotiation and be given “in a published job vacancy notice, prior to the job interview or otherwise”. Employers may not ask applicants about their pay history, and job vacancy notices and job titles must be gender-neutral.
In practice, this means every vacancy needs an approved range before it opens. Our guide to transparent salary job postings covers how wide a range should be and how to write it.
Transparent Pay-Setting and Progression Criteria (Article 6)
Employers must make the criteria used to determine pay, pay levels and pay progression easily accessible to workers, and those criteria must be objective and gender-neutral. Member states may exempt employers with fewer than 50 workers from the pay progression part. If your pay decisions rely on manager discretion or individual negotiation, this is where the gap will show.
Employees’ Right to Information (Article 7)
Workers can request, in writing, their individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, for workers doing the same work or work of equal value. They can ask directly, through workers’ representatives or through an equality body, and can request clarifications if the answer is incomplete. Key operational rules:
- Answer within a reasonable period, and at the latest within two months.
- Inform all workers every year of this right and how to use it.
- Pay secrecy clauses are banned: workers may disclose their own pay to enforce equal pay.
- Employers can require that information about colleagues’ pay is used only to exercise the right to equal pay, and personal data must be handled under the GDPR (Article 12).
Gender Pay Gap Reporting (Article 9)
Employers with 100 or more workers must report seven indicators, always for the previous calendar year:
- The gender pay gap (mean).
- The gender pay gap in complementary or variable components.
- The median gender pay gap.
- The median gender pay gap in complementary or variable components.
- The proportion of women and men receiving complementary or variable components.
- The proportion of women and men in each quartile pay band.
- The gender pay gap by category of workers, split into basic pay and complementary or variable components.
The information goes to the national monitoring body; indicators 1–6 can be published, and indicator 7 must be shared with all workers and their representatives. Management must confirm the accuracy of the data after consulting workers’ representatives, who have access to the methodology. Because bonuses count, our articles on bonus structures and bonus timing are worth reviewing alongside your reporting design.
Joint Pay Assessment (Article 10)
A joint pay assessment, carried out with workers’ representatives, is required when all three conditions are met: a difference in average pay between women and men of at least 5% in any category of workers, the employer has not justified it with objective, gender-neutral criteria, and it has not remedied it within six months of submitting the report. The assessment must analyze each category, explain the differences, set out remediation measures and review the job evaluation system itself.
Enforcement, Burden of Proof and Penalties (Articles 16–23)
This is what turns the Directive from a reporting exercise into a real legal risk:
- Compensation has no upper limit and includes full back pay, related bonuses and payments in kind, lost opportunities, non-material damage and interest (Article 16).
- The burden of proof shifts to the employer once a worker presents facts suggesting discrimination. If the employer has not implemented the transparency obligations in Articles 5, 6, 7, 9 and 10, it must prove there was no discrimination, unless the failure was manifestly unintentional and minor (Article 18).
- Comparisons are not limited to colleagues employed at the same time, and where no real comparator exists, statistics or a hypothetical comparison can be used (Article 19).
- Limitation periods must be at least three years and cannot start before the worker knows, or could reasonably know, about the infringement (Article 21).
- Member states must set effective, proportionate and dissuasive penalties, including fines, and specific penalties for repeated infringements (Article 23).
Timeline and Key Deadlines
| Date |
Milestone |
| 17 May 2023 |
Directive (EU) 2023/970 published in the Official Journal |
| 7 June 2026 |
Transposition deadline for member states |
| Calendar year 2026 |
Reference period for the first reports of employers with 150+ workers |
| 7 June 2027 |
First gender pay gap report: 250+ workers (then every year) and 150–249 workers (then every three years) |
| 7 June 2031 |
First report for employers with 100–149 workers (then every three years) |
Transposition is uneven. As of September 2026, Euronews reported that only a handful of member states, including Italy, had fully transposed the Directive, while Germany had delayed its implementation until early 2027. The obligations apply to employers as each national law comes into force, so a multinational may face different rules and start dates in each country. Our article on the 2026 EU pay transparency law tracks the transposition picture.
Waiting for your national law is risky for one practical reason: the first reports use the previous calendar year’s data, so the 2026 pay decisions of employers with 150 or more workers are already the raw material of the 2027 report.
Practitioners warn against reading national delays as a reprieve: when Ireland signalled it would miss the June deadline, Mary Cullen, Managing Director of the Irish HR consultancy Insight HR, put it this way:
Mary CullenManaging Director, Insight HR
One of the key requirements behind pay transparency is job evaluation and that work takes time. In many organisations it can take months to properly review roles, assess their value, and build a defensible pay structure. What’s striking is that up to 80% of Irish employers have not yet started this process.
How Ready Are Employers? TalentUp Data
Pay ranges in job ads are the most visible sign of readiness, because they are the first obligation candidates notice. TalentUp’s job postings database gives a picture of where European employers stand.
~22%
of job ads in Germany state a salary, ~27% in Spain and ~17% in Italy (2026)
11x
more EU job ads mention pay transparency rules than in 2024 (105 vs 1,163 postings)
21 per 100,000
EU job ads now reference these rules, up from fewer than 1 in 2024
Source: TalentUp job postings database, January–September 2026 (mentions: 2024 vs 2026). Minimum estimates, see methodology below.
| Country |
Job ads stating a salary, Jan–Sep 2026 |
| Austria |
~58% |
| Netherlands |
~50% |
| Poland |
~35% |
| Spain |
~27% |
| France |
~25% |
| Germany |
~22% |
| Ireland |
~21% |
| Belgium |
~19% |
| Italy |
~17% |
| Portugal |
~11% |
Three findings stand out:
- Outside Austria and the Netherlands, most job ads still do not state pay. In Germany, France, Spain and Italy, roughly three in four ads or more still give candidates no figure.
- Poland stands out. It is the only large market in the table where rules requiring pay information for candidates were already in force during 2026, and about a third of its ads now state a salary, well above Germany, France or Italy.
- Awareness is growing fast, from a low base. Job ads that explicitly reference the Directive or the national pay transparency rules (for example “Pay Transparency Directive”, “trasparenza retributiva”, “Entgelttransparenz” or “lönetransparens”) rose from 105 in January–September 2024 to 1,163 in the same months of 2026. Italy leads with 375 such ads, consistent with its early transposition, followed by Ireland (290). That is still only about 0.02% of all postings.
The message for HR: candidates will soon expect a range in every ad, and most employers have not yet built the pay structures to publish one with confidence.
How to Prepare for the EU Pay Transparency Directive: Step by Step
The steps follow the order in which they depend on each other: you cannot publish a defensible range, answer an information request or explain a gap without a job architecture and a job evaluation underneath.
1. Set Up Governance and Scope
Appoint a project owner in HR or Total Rewards, with legal, payroll, finance, HRIS and, where they exist, workers’ representatives involved from the start: the Directive gives them a role in the job evaluation criteria, the accuracy of reports and joint pay assessments. List every country where you employ people, your headcount per legal entity (it determines your reporting date) and the status of each national law.
2. Build a Job Architecture
Map every role into job families and levels with up-to-date job descriptions. This is the backbone of “categories of workers”: if two people with the same title do very different work, or different titles hide the same work, your categories and your gap figures will be wrong. Clean up job titles at the same time, since Article 5 requires them to be gender-neutral.
3. Evaluate Jobs With Gender-Neutral Criteria
Score roles on skills, effort, responsibility and working conditions, plus any other factor relevant to the job, and agree the criteria with workers’ representatives where they exist. Check that soft skills are not undervalued, which the Directive calls out explicitly: care, communication and coordination skills often sit in roles mostly held by women. The result is a set of groups of work of equal value, which become your reporting categories.
Collective agreement grades are no shortcut either: Stefan Waschmann, an Austrian pay expert and author of the book Fair Pay, points out that the EU Court of Justice has already ruled on this question:
Stefan WaschmannPay expert, author of Fair Pay, lohntransparenz.eu
By the way, the EUCJ ruled already a few times on the question if a job category of collective agreements implies that this category determines work of equal value […] eg. in case Brunnhofer C-381/99: “the fact that a female employee who claims to be the victim of discrimination on grounds of sex and the male comparator are classified in the same job category under the collective agreement governing their employment is not in itself sufficient for concluding that the two employees concerned are performing the same work or work to which equal value is attributed […], since this fact is only one indication amongst others that this criterion is met”
4. Define Pay Ranges and Pay-Setting Rules
Set a pay range for every level or group, based on current market data for the same job content and location, and write down the criteria that place someone within the range (experience, performance, scarce skills) and how people progress. Our guide on salary benchmarking for pay transparency compliance explains how to build ranges you can defend, and market salaries vs. internal equity covers the tension between the two. The free pay transparency salary benchmark is a practical starting point.
5. Run a Gender Pay Gap Analysis Now
Calculate all seven Article 9 indicators on your 2026 data, including variable pay and benefits in kind, both company-wide and per category of workers. For every category with a gap of 5% or more, document whether it is explained by objective, gender-neutral factors; if it is not, plan and budget the correction now, so it does not reach the first official report or trigger a joint pay assessment.
6. Update Recruitment
Add an approved range to every vacancy, or a documented process for sharing it before the interview. Remove pay history questions from application forms, ATS fields, interview guides and recruiter scripts, and replace them with questions about expectations. Review ad templates for gender-neutral language and titles, and include collective agreement provisions where relevant.
Decide who receives requests, who extracts the data, who approves the answer and how you track the two-month deadline. Prepare answer templates that show the worker’s pay level and the average pay by sex for their category, with rules for small categories where an individual’s pay could be identified. Schedule the annual notice to all workers and remove pay confidentiality clauses from contracts and policies.
8. Prepare Reporting and Documentation
Make sure payroll and HRIS hold sex, category, base pay, variable components and hours in a consistent way across countries, so the report can be produced, confirmed by management and explained to workers’ representatives. Keep a record of the reasons behind pay decisions: with the burden of proof on the employer and limitation periods of at least three years, documentation is your main defense.
9. Train Managers and Communicate
Managers are the ones who will be asked “why do I earn less than her?”. Train them on the pay ranges, the criteria and what they can and cannot say, and explain the changes to employees before the first ad with a range or the first report appears. Decide how far you want to go beyond the legal minimum: our articles on how much pay information to share and how pay transparency can backfire help you avoid the classic pitfalls.
EU Pay Transparency Directive Checklist
Use this checklist to track your preparation. Dates assume the Directive’s minimum timeline; adjust them to the national law of each country.
| # |
Area |
Action |
Article |
Owner |
By when |
| 1 |
Governance |
Project owner, steering group and workers’ representatives involved |
Art. 4, 9, 10, 13 |
HR / Total Rewards |
Now |
| 2 |
Scope |
Headcount per entity and country, national law status tracked |
Art. 9, 34 |
HR, Legal |
Now |
| 3 |
Job architecture |
All roles mapped to families and levels, gender-neutral titles |
Art. 4, 5 |
HR / Total Rewards |
Now |
| 4 |
Job evaluation |
Gender-neutral evaluation (skills, effort, responsibility, working conditions), categories defined |
Art. 3, 4 |
Total Rewards, workers’ reps |
Before first report |
| 5 |
Pay ranges |
Range per level or group, based on market data |
Art. 4, 5, 6 |
Total Rewards |
Before ranges are shared with candidates |
| 6 |
Pay policy |
Written criteria for pay, pay levels and progression, accessible to all |
Art. 6 |
Total Rewards |
As national law applies |
| 7 |
Recruitment |
Range shared before the interview, no pay history questions, neutral ads |
Art. 5 |
Talent Acquisition |
As national law applies |
| 8 |
Information requests |
Workflow, templates, two-month deadline tracking |
Art. 7 |
HR operations |
As national law applies |
| 9 |
Annual notice |
All workers informed every year of their right to information |
Art. 7(3) |
HR |
Yearly |
| 10 |
Contracts |
Pay secrecy clauses removed |
Art. 7(5) |
Legal |
As national law applies |
| 11 |
Gap analysis |
Seven indicators on 2026 data, by category, gaps of 5%+ explained or corrected |
Art. 9, 10 |
Total Rewards, Payroll |
Now (250+ and 150–249 workers) |
| 12 |
Reporting |
Report produced, accuracy confirmed by management, shared with workers and the authority |
Art. 9 |
HR, Payroll, Management |
7 June 2027 (150+) / 7 June 2031 (100–149) |
| 13 |
Remediation |
Budget and plan for unjustified gaps within six months of reporting |
Art. 10 |
HR, Finance |
Within 6 months of each report |
| 14 |
Documentation |
Reasons for pay decisions recorded and retained |
Art. 18, 21 |
HR, managers |
Ongoing |
| 15 |
Training |
Managers and recruiters trained, employee communication plan ready |
Art. 5, 6, 7 |
HR |
Before first range or report |
| 16 |
Accessibility and data |
Information accessible to people with disabilities; GDPR rules for pay data |
Art. 8, 12 |
HR, DPO |
As national law applies |
Common Mistakes When Preparing
| Mistake |
Why it is a problem |
What to do instead |
| Waiting for the national law |
The 2027 report uses 2026 data, and gaps take budget cycles to close |
Analyze 2026 data now and plan corrections |
| Counting only base salary |
“Pay” includes variable components and benefits in kind |
Build reporting on total pay, split base and variable |
| Using job titles as categories |
Titles rarely reflect work of equal value |
Base categories on a gender-neutral job evaluation |
| Ranges set from past offers |
They carry old gaps forward and drift from the market |
Build ranges from current market data and documented criteria |
| No answer process for requests |
The two-month deadline is short in a multi-country organization |
Set up a workflow and templates before requests arrive |
| Treating it as an HR-only project |
Payroll, legal, finance and workers’ representatives all have formal roles |
Run it as a cross-functional program |
TalentUp’s methodology explains how our salary benchmarks are built, and the European Salary Benchmark Report gives a wider view of pay levels across Europe.
Sources
- TalentUp. Job postings database, January–September 2024 (11.4 million postings) and January–September 2026 (5.5 million postings) in 11 EU countries; salary shares from a random sample of about 7,000 postings with full descriptions, January–September 2026 (see methodology above).
- European Parliament and Council of the EU. Directive (EU) 2023/970 of 10 May 2023 to strengthen the application of the principle of equal pay for equal work or work of equal value between men and women through pay transparency and enforcement mechanisms. Official Journal of the European Union, L 132, 17 May 2023. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/970/oj
- Euronews. EU pay transparency: Are job ads finally getting honest about salaries? (8 September 2026). https://www.euronews.com/2026/09/08/eu-pay-transparency-are-job-ads-finally-getting-honest-about-salaries