How to increase your salary comes down to a handful of levers: moving up a level, moving to a better-paid role or employer, adding skills the market pays for, choosing the right career track, and negotiating with market data in hand. Some levers add a few percent; others re-price you by 20% or more. The right one depends on where your pay sits today compared with the market.
This guide compares the eight main levers, shows what the evidence says about each, and adds TalentUp data from about 50,000 salaried job ads published worldwide in January–September 2026: how much more employers advertise for senior and lead roles, what the management track pays versus the specialist track, and which skills and certifications carry a measurable premium. It ends with a 12-month plan you can follow.
Key takeaways
- Know your market rate first: every lever works better when you can show where your pay sits against the market.
- Moving up a level is the most reliable lever: senior titles advertise about 19% more than unprefixed titles, and lead, staff and principal titles about 29% more (TalentUp, 2026).
- The management track pays more in finance (accounting managers +17% to +42% vs senior accountants), but in software engineering, staff and lead engineers close much of the gap.
- Skills beat badges: AI/ML skills (+13%) and CPA (+10%) carried consistent premiums; ACCA and AWS certifications did not, outside specific roles.
- Changing jobs pays most early in your career or when you are below market; see our job hopping vs staying guide.
- Once the EU Pay Transparency Directive is transposed, you can request average pay for your category of work, which makes negotiation far less of a guess.
The 8 Career Levers for Higher Pay at a Glance
| Lever |
What it does to your pay |
Typical size (evidence) |
Best when |
| Promotion |
Moves you to a higher pay range |
Senior vs mid-level titles: about +19% advertised pay (TalentUp 2026) |
A higher-level role exists and you already work at that level |
| Internal move |
Re-prices you in a better-paid role family |
Depends on the role gap; often needs a re-benchmark to happen |
Your skills fit a scarcer, better-paid role inside your company |
| Job change |
Re-prices you at today’s market rate |
Cyclical; largest early in a career |
You are below market and no promotion is in sight |
| Skills |
Moves you into a better-paid segment of your role |
AI/ML in software ads +13%, SQL in data analyst ads +8% |
The skill is used daily in the job, not just listed |
| Certifications |
Signals a standard of competence |
CPA +10%, PMP +9%; ACCA, AWS mixed |
The credential is required or preferred for your role |
| Management track |
Adds a people-leadership premium |
Accounting manager vs senior accountant +17% to +42% |
You want to lead people, not just do the work |
| Location and remote |
Changes the market you are priced against |
Large differences between countries and cities |
Your employer pays by location, or you can access a higher-paying market |
| Negotiation |
Captures value you already have |
Depends on your gap to market |
You have market data and a documented case |
The figures come from different sources and are not additive. Use the table to decide which lever to pull first, then read the section for it.
What Moving Up a Level Pays: TalentUp Data 2026
Level is the strongest single driver of pay inside a role. To measure it, we compared the median advertised salary of job ads by the seniority word in the title (junior, no prefix, senior, lead/staff/principal) for the same role in the same country.
+19%
median advertised pay for senior titles vs unprefixed titles (higher in 37 of 38 cells)
+29%
for lead, staff and principal titles (higher in all 14 cells with enough data)
−17%
for junior titles (lower in all 8 cells with enough data)
Source: TalentUp job postings database, January–September 2026, about 37,000 salaried ads in 38 role-country cells across 11 countries.
Median advertised salary by title level, unprefixed (mid-level) title = 100:
| Role |
Country |
Junior |
Mid (no prefix) |
Senior |
Lead / staff / principal |
Ads (n) |
| Software engineer / developer |
United States |
83 |
100 |
127 |
139 |
9,517 |
| Software engineer / developer |
United Kingdom |
78 |
100 |
121 |
139 |
1,284 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Canada |
n/a |
100 |
124 |
134 |
1,576 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Singapore |
n/a |
100 |
123 |
139 |
595 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Netherlands |
n/a |
100 |
118 |
120 |
555 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Spain |
n/a |
100 |
131 |
n/a |
923 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Italy |
n/a |
100 |
105 |
n/a |
664 |
| DevOps / cloud engineer |
United States |
82 |
100 |
120 |
127 |
2,884 |
| DevOps / cloud engineer |
United Kingdom |
n/a |
100 |
127 |
163 |
659 |
| Data analyst |
United States |
n/a |
100 |
115 |
139 |
631 |
| Security engineer / analyst |
United States |
n/a |
100 |
119 |
130 |
736 |
| Accountant |
United States |
n/a |
100 |
123 |
124 |
808 |
| Accountant |
Canada |
77 |
100 |
118 |
n/a |
604 |
| Accountant |
Italy |
86 |
100 |
123 |
n/a |
323 |
| Accountant |
United Kingdom |
n/a |
100 |
88 |
n/a |
684 |
| Project manager |
United Kingdom |
n/a |
100 |
125 |
n/a |
652 |
| Project manager |
United States |
n/a |
100 |
113 |
115 |
1,330 |
| Sales (AE, sales rep, account manager) |
United States |
63 |
100 |
117 |
n/a |
3,419 |
| Sales (AE, sales rep, account manager) |
United Kingdom |
86 |
100 |
121 |
n/a |
2,063 |
n/a: fewer than 30 ads at that level.
What this means for you:
- The senior step is worth roughly a fifth of your pay in most roles and countries. If you already do senior-level work under a mid-level title, a re-levelling is often worth more than several annual raises.
- Titles are not standard across markets. The UK accountant row is the one exception: unprefixed “Accountant” ads there advertised more than “Senior Accountant” ads, a reminder that titles carry different meanings by company and country. Compare job content, not just the label.
- Lead, staff and principal titles add a further step on top of senior (median index 129 vs 119 across the cells we could measure). They are the gateway to the highest-paid individual contributor roles.
For how pay rises with years of experience required (rather than title), see the market pay curve in our job hopping vs staying guide.
All three moves raise pay by putting you in a higher-paid role. Research on matched employer-employee data from Portugal found substantial wage returns to both promotions and job-to-job transitions, and that what employers call a promotion often differs from a real change in hierarchical level (Silva and van der Klaauw, 2011). A new title without new scope or a new pay range is not the same thing.
|
Promotion |
Internal move |
New employer |
| How your new pay is set |
Often your old salary plus a percentage |
Often unchanged unless someone re-benchmarks it |
Today’s market rate for the role, level and location |
| Risk |
Low |
Low to medium |
Medium: new team, probation, lost unvested pay |
| What to ask for |
The pay of the new level, not a fixed % on your old salary |
A market review of the new role |
Total package compared with what you leave behind |
| Works best when |
The next level exists and you already work at it |
Your skills fit a better-paid role family |
You are below market and stuck |
Two practical points:
- Promotion pay is often anchored to your old salary. If you were at the bottom of your band, a standard promotion increase can leave you at the bottom of the next one. Ask where the new salary sits in the new range and how it compares with the market.
- Internal moves are the most under-priced lever. Moving from, say, support into DevOps, or from finance operations into FP&A, can put you in a better-paid role family, but many companies only change pay at promotion time. Ask for a market review whenever your role changes materially.
Changing employer is the classic shortcut, but its premium rises and falls with the hiring cycle and is largest early in a career. We cover the evidence, what you forfeit when you leave and how employers read short tenures in job hopping vs staying long term.
Skills and Certifications That Increase Salary
Not every course pays. To see which skills employers actually pay for, we compared ads for the same role, country and title level that mention a skill or certification with those that do not.
| Role |
Skill or certification mentioned |
Advertised pay premium |
Cells |
Ads with / without |
Cells with a premium |
| Software engineer / developer |
AI / machine learning / LLMs |
+12.9% |
11 |
1,833 / 10,534 |
8 of 11 |
| DevOps / cloud engineer |
Kubernetes |
+14.0% |
12 |
1,264 / 3,301 |
9 of 12 |
| Software engineer / developer |
Kubernetes |
+7.7% |
15 |
2,545 / 10,746 |
11 of 15 |
| Accountant |
CPA |
+9.6% |
7 |
861 / 1,051 |
6 of 7 |
| Project manager |
PMP |
+9.2% |
5 |
320 / 1,350 |
5 of 5 (none negative) |
| Data analyst |
SQL |
+7.9% |
5 |
443 / 368 |
4 of 5 |
| Data analyst |
Python |
+7.1% |
4 |
300 / 435 |
4 of 4 |
| DevOps / cloud engineer (US) |
AWS certification |
+11.9% |
2 |
121 / 2,371 |
2 of 2 |
| Software engineer / developer (US) |
AWS certification |
−8.9% |
2 |
75 / 7,761 |
0 of 2 |
| Security engineer / analyst (US) |
CISSP |
+6.7% |
2 |
151 / 509 |
1 of 2 |
| Accountant (UK, US, Singapore) |
ACCA |
−3.3% |
4 |
300 / 903 |
1 of 4 |
Premium = ad-weighted average of the difference in median advertised pay within each role-country-level cell. Cells need at least 20 ads with and 20 without the mention.
Three lessons:
- Skills in demand beat generic credentials. AI/ML skills and Kubernetes carry a premium across many countries. In the US, software ads asking for AI/ML skills advertised +14% at mid level and +13% at senior level (about 1,400 ads with the mention). See which technologies are most requested in the most popular programming languages and frameworks.
- A certification pays where it is the gatekeeper for the role. CPA for accountants in the US, Canada, Australia and Singapore and PMP for project managers showed consistent premiums. AWS certification paid in US DevOps and cloud ads, but not in US software engineering ads. ACCA showed no premium in accountant ads, though it did in accounting manager ads in the UK and Singapore (+9%, 560 ads).
- Official statistics point the same way. In the US, full-time workers with a professional certification or license had median weekly earnings of $1,460 in 2025, against $1,131 for those without (BLS). That gap reflects differences in occupation and education too, so treat it as context, not as the value of one certificate.
If you work in a new field where few ads exist yet, see how employers price emerging roles such as AI engineer.
Management Track vs Specialist Track
At some point most professionals choose between leading people and deepening expertise. The data shows that the right answer depends on your field.
| Comparison (median advertised pay) |
United States |
Canada |
United Kingdom |
Netherlands |
Singapore |
Australia |
Italy |
| Accounting / finance manager vs senior accountant |
+42% |
+34% |
+24% |
n/a |
+17% |
+27% |
+27% |
| Engineering manager vs senior software engineer |
+30% |
+31% |
−7% |
+13% |
+7% |
n/a |
n/a |
| Lead / staff / principal engineer vs senior software engineer |
+10% |
+8% |
+14% |
+2% |
+13% |
n/a |
n/a |
TalentUp job ads, January–September 2026; only cells with at least 30 ads per group. n/a: not enough data.
- In finance, management is the main pay path. Accounting and finance manager ads advertised between 17% and 42% more than senior accountant ads in every country we could measure.
- In tech, the specialist track is a real alternative. In the UK and Singapore, staff, lead and principal engineers advertised as much as or more than engineering managers; in the US and Canada, managers still lead.
- Choose the track for the work, not just the pay. Managing people is a different job. If you move into management only for the premium, the next step up will be harder.
Location and Remote Work
Where you are paid matters as much as what you do. In our data, the median advertised salary of a mid-level software engineer ranged from about €40,000 in Spain and Italy to €66,000 in the Netherlands and the UK and €121,000 in the United States. Cost of living, taxes and social security narrow that gap, but they do not close it.
Remote work can change which market you are priced against. Some employers pay one rate everywhere; most adjust by location. Before you accept a remote role or relocate, ask how the employer sets pay by location and whether it changes if you move. We discuss the trade-offs for employers in offering the same salary regardless of location.
How to Get a Raise Using Market Data
Negotiation does not create value out of nothing: it captures the value you already have. It works best when you know three numbers: your current pay, the market median for your role, level and location, and the pay of the next level up.
- Benchmark yourself. Compare your salary with the market for the same role, level and city. A free benchmark like TalentUp’s salary benchmarking gives you a reference point; our guide on how salary benchmarking works explains how to read percentiles.
- Decide what you are asking for. Below market: a market correction. At market with a bigger scope: the next level’s pay. At or above market: a promotion path with dates and criteria.
- Document impact. Results, scope added and skills acquired in the last 12 months, in numbers where possible.
- Time it. Ask before budgets are set, usually one or two months before the annual salary review, not after it.
- Name a number and the evidence behind it. Then stop talking and listen.
- If the answer is no, ask what would make it yes, and agree a review date in writing.
HR teams use the same logic when an employee says their pay is too low; seeing how HR handles a “my salary is too low” conversation helps you prepare the evidence they will look for.
Negotiation and the Gender Gap
A meta-analysis of 55 studies with 17,504 students and employees found that women were less likely than men to initiate negotiations, but the difference was small and shrank when it was clear that negotiating was appropriate (Kugler et al., 2018). Clear pay information reduces that ambiguity for everyone, which is one reason pay transparency matters for negotiation.
Your Pay Transparency Rights in the EU
The EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023/970) had to be transposed by 7 June 2026, and its rights apply once transposed into your country’s national law. Where they apply:
- Right to information: you can request in writing your individual pay level and the average pay levels, broken down by sex, for workers doing the same work or work of equal value. Your employer must answer within two months and remind workers of this right every year. You will not receive individual colleagues’ salaries.
- Pay progression criteria: employers must make the criteria used to set pay and pay progression easily accessible (member states may exempt employers with fewer than 50 workers from the progression part).
- No pay secrecy: you cannot be prevented from disclosing your own pay for equal pay purposes.
- When applying for a job: you are entitled to the starting pay or range before the interview, and employers may not ask about your pay history. See candidate salary expectations under the Directive.
The average pay for your category of work is the best possible anchor for a raise conversation: it is your employer’s own data.
A 12-Month Plan to Increase Your Salary
| When |
What to do |
Output |
| Month 1 |
Benchmark your pay against the market for your role, level and location; once the Directive applies in your country, request your category’s average pay |
Your gap to market, in % |
| Month 1–2 |
Ask your manager what the next level requires and which pay range it carries |
Written level criteria |
| Month 2–6 |
Close one or two skill gaps that the market pays for in your role (for example AI/ML, Kubernetes, SQL, CPA, PMP) and use them in real projects |
Results you can show |
| Month 3–9 |
Take on scope at the next level: a project, a team, a client, a system |
Documented impact |
| Month 9–10 |
Ask for a re-levelling or market correction before budgets are set |
A decision and a date |
| Month 10–12 |
If the answer is no without a credible path, test the external market |
Offers to compare on total package |
Two rules make the plan work: change one lever at a time and measure it, and always compare total pay, including bonus, equity and benefits, not just base salary. Annual budgets matter too: see what salary increase budgets for 2027 look like before you set your target.
Sources
- TalentUp. Job postings database, January–September 2026 (methodology above). See also our methodology and the European Salary Benchmark Report.
- U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Median weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers by certification and licensing status and occupation, 2025 annual averages.
- Silva, A. and van der Klaauw, B. (2011). Wage dynamics and promotions inside and between firms. Journal of Population Economics, 24(4), 1513–1548. doi:10.1007/s00148-010-0336-6.
- Kugler, K. G., Reif, J. A. M., Kaschner, T. and Brodbeck, F. C. (2018). Gender differences in the initiation of negotiations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 144(2), 198–222. doi:10.1037/bul0000135.
- European Union. Directive (EU) 2023/970 on pay transparency, Articles 5, 6 and 7.